RSS

Of Gentiles and Homosexuals

29 Jul

In the first century a division emerged in the early Christian church.  As we are well aware, Jesus was a Jew. His disciples were Jews.  He taught about the Jewish G-d, and claimed to be His Son.  His followers believed he was the Jewish Messiah.  It seemed destined that Christianity was destined to be a sect of Judaism. Christians were to celebrate the same holidays, follow the same Mosaic laws found in the Torah, and insist new converts become Jews through the traditional conversion rituals.  However, all that changed on a rooftop in a town called Joppa.

The story is told in Acts 10.  You can read the full story for yourself here.  I’ll condense it here for those of you who are too lazy to click on the link 😉  In the account Peter has a vision.  In said vision he sees a smorgasbord from heaven descend right before his eyes.  The buffet was filled the delicious delights like bacon, ham, Philistine National® hot dogs, clams, shrimp, lobster, etc.  It contained every delectable dish that, according to the Torah, was impure and unclean.  A voice calls to Peter from heaven telling him to eat the feast that has been set before him.  Peter, being a good Jew, attempts to correct G-d’s mistake.  Apparently G-d had forgotten that he commanded his chosen people never to eat such animals in His holy, infallible and eternally applicable scripture.  G-d assures Peter he is quite serious…three times.

When Peter comes out of the vision, he hears a knock at the door.  It’s a couple gentiles, inviting him to the house of their gentile master, Cornelius.  Peter starts to get the point of the vision.  Apparently the vision wasn’t as much about discarding Jewish dietary traditions as it was about moving past the exclusivism of his religion, which has traditionally rejected non-Jews.  So Peter goes with them, and once he arrives at Cornelius’s house he makes this declaration:  “You are well aware that it is against our law for a Jew to associate with or visit a Gentile. But G-d has shown me that I should not call anyone impure or unclean.”

One might imagine how the conservative Christians of the day would respond to Peter’s new-found leniency on issues of Jewishness of G-d’s followers and on the Mosaic Law.  They would likely complain that Peter was teaching a doctrine that was unscriptural. They would accuse him of leading others into sin by encouraging them to pick and choose which parts of the law they would follow and what parts they would ignore.  Surely he just accepted the gentiles because it made him feel good.  They would, of course, say that Peter was denying the absolute truth and authority of G-d’s Word and in so doing was denying G-d himself.

Although it’s of little doubt this debate occurred in the early church, Peter and many other early church apostles pressed forward.  Their love for the gentiles and confidence that G-d did not and would not exclude them caused them to persist despite challenges of the more conservative crowd.  Before long other Christians began to accept the gentiles, then other leaders like Paul and Barnabas followed in their footsteps.  The movement proved to be as unstoppable as an avalanche.  The global, primarily gentile, face of Christianity emerged out of that one vision on that one rooftop, in Joppa nearly 2000 years ago.

From time to time the church takes another inclusive step in this worthy tradition.  In our past, minority races were once put in subservient roles in our churches.  Today such racial discrimination is abhorred by almost all Christians.   There was once a time where women were to remain silent in church and were not allowed to hold any authority over a man.  Although not yet quite as successful as the transition away from racism, sexism is fast becoming a thing of the past in our faith.
'Albany Gay Pride Parade 2008' photo (c) 2008, Tim Schapker - license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/

A new movement is afoot in today’s Christianity.  Many christians are now tiring of holding homosexuals at arm’s length.  The preconceived notion that they are an abomination, that they are immoral, that they are not worthy of G-d’s love is losing popularity.  Of course the fundamentalists will pull out their bibles as if they were weapons and attempt to brow beat our acceptance of and love for the LGBT community back into submission. They will proclaim the corruption and impurity of gay people.  They will insist that because they are gay, they must be rejected by G-d.

When they do, I hope that we respond in the manner Peter did when he faced the same criticism: “Brothers, you know that some time ago G-d made a choice among you that LGBT people* might hear from my lips the message of the gospel and believe. G-d, who knows the heart, showed that he accepted them by giving the Holy Spirit to them, just as he did to us. He did not discriminate between us and them, for he purified their hearts by faith. Now then, why do you try to test G-d by putting on the necks of the LGTB community* a yoke that neither we nor our ancestors have been able to bear? No! We believe it is through the grace of our Lord Jesus that we are saved, just as they are.”  – Acts 15:7-11

*My word replacement, LGBT for Gentile.

Advertisements
 
4 Comments

Posted by on July 29, 2011 in Christianity, Emerging Church, LGBT

 

4 responses to “Of Gentiles and Homosexuals

  1. Daniel James Levy

    July 29, 2011 at 8:15 pm

    Jim, it seems you haven’t really made a clear stance on the matter. I, of course am not for keeping those with homosexual tendencies/attraction at arms length. But, whilst I take the stance of inclusion to all who hear the message of repentence, LGBT(S) alike, it is one of picking up your cross and dying. Do you think homosexual practice is sin?

     
  2. jimwangerin

    July 29, 2011 at 8:38 pm

    Thanks for the comment Daniel.

    For clarity, I do not believe that homosexual practice in and of itself is a sin. In our society, the LGBT community is fighting diligently to make life-long, loving commitments to each other through marriage. This is in no way related to the temple orgies, referred to a couple of times in the Bible, that occurred during idol worship in the first century. While many straight Christians are crowded at the exit to leave their marriage commitments…gays are crowded at the door begging to enter into them. It seems very difficult for me to reduce their love and resolute commitment in the face of adversity as lust or a kind of sexual depravity.

    For me, sin is not sin because of a word that is written down. There is a difference between the letter of the law and the spirit of the law. Sin is not sin because a group of religious people decides to condemn people for doing it. Sin is a sin if it harms the people you are supposed to be loving. In that, I’d say that we Christians have sinned greatly against the LGBT community while they, in general, have responded by being more committed and resolute in love.

     
  3. Reed Boyer

    July 30, 2011 at 3:32 pm

    Jim,

    Thank you for this thought-provoking reminder of the differences between Petrine inclusiveness and Paulist exclusion, Christians and Christianists, Jesus-followers and Bibliolators, and “the general divide” on “the issue” (LGBT people as either demonic creatures or children of G-d).

    Daniel’s position is a very familiar one: “I embrace them, but not ‘what they do.'” This perfectly crystallizes the crux of the matter (“Yes, BUT” is not the unconditional ‘yes”). And by “crux,” I intentionally use the word in its Latin root: “cross.” The cross LGBTQs have not “taken up,” which is thrust upon them: “in order to satisfy our view of the will of G-d, you must reject yourselves as G-d created you and not act upon your G-d-given natures, for to do so you will be detestable in the eyes of G-d.” This kind of judgmental legalism masquerading as holiness, elevating itself above others, presuming absolute knowledge of G-d (and presenting an extreme and limited view of the deity) is a form of false witness.

    I’m sure this article will be roundly condemned by “the best people,” and welcomed with tears of joy by a few wounded souls wearied by existing as a paradox and “an issue.” If it leads any of them back to the love of G-d (especially young ones who contemplate suicide daily as an escape from being “demonized out of love”), you will have done better than merely “well”: you will have done GOOD (in its purest sense).

    Thank you again.

     
    • jimwangerin

      July 30, 2011 at 9:53 pm

      Reed, Thank you very much for your kind words of affirmation. It means a lot to me after some of the responses I’ve gotten.

       

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: